🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this same narrative rather than debunking it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• His list featured various figures, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. The grittier interpretation led Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to examine.