Skip to content
FocusTracker

The Worst Games of This Year, Based on Metacritic

At every turn, fans are eagerly sharing their selections of the top titles of 2025. However, what of the flops, the failures? Let's take a momentary detour to recognize the lowest-rated games of the year, as determined by the aggregate scores from Metacritic. Is every one of these games truly as terrible as the ratings suggest? Here is the list.

10. Welcome Tour for Switch 2

Aggregate Score: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

First impressions to this showcase title were colored by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a bundled game like competing console launches. Professional assessment spanned a wide spectrum, from harsh disappointment to more generous reviews that highlighted the polished software itself. Despite the controversy, the title proved to be a strong seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Presented as "not just a racing game," this simulation from European developers garnered largely negative reviews. Critics noted that the game was lacking in nearly every way, notably in a year featuring excellent racing experiences. Ultimately, this underwhelming entry was better off left on the shelf.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the irritating title grammar is a silly annoyance. This collection of 1990s-era Bubsy titles showcases a "attitude"-filled feline known for non-stop quips. Reviewers noted that these games were not good in their time and have not improved with age. The improbably high user score remains a curious anomaly to the professional reviews.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Aggregate Score: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This anime-inspired fighting game encountered significant backlash from both critics and fans. It was lambasted for a small character selection and a dearth of gameplay modes. User reviews was particularly vitriolic, with some voicing a wish that the title's flop would serve as a lesson for future projects.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

Hailing from the anime-style Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this motorcycle action game tasks players with collecting slime-like creatures. Critics argued that its goal to mimic a rolling-collection experience was unsuccessful, coming across as more of a low-effort product than a substantial addition to the franchise. Its brief runtime combined with a $40 price tag was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the past, finally released after a very long time in development hell. The team behind it made the decision to preserve the game as an period-accurate experience of its time, acknowledging that today's audiences might criticize its retro feel. As such, many reviews concluded that the fascinating story of its development was far richer than the game itself.

4. Salvation

Aggregate Score: 44, User Score: 2.4

This anime-art action game drawing from games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. Frequent criticisms included repetitive adversaries, samey environments, and a unengaging plot. A controversial mechanic involving the character's attire was universally disliked and undermined the game's enjoyment.

3. Ambulance Life: A Paramedic Simulator

Metascore: 44, User Score: 4.9

Recall the tense medical sims of the past, then take out the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Reviewers found the ambulance-driving sequences to be a slog, and the treatment of its subject matter was criticized as being insensitive. The overall experience was deemed a missed opportunity.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic virtual pet formula turns the franchise into a shopping simulation title. The result, based on critics, was a dull collection of simple minigames that rapidly grew tiresome. Some reviews went so far as to declare it one of the lowest-quality titles available on its platform, pointing to a profound lack of depth.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Positioned as a high-profile GTA-style title from a studio led by industry veterans, *MindsEye* was a catastrophic critical flop. Reviews heavily criticized its lousy combat, dull missions, and a host of horrendous bugs. Critics found it to be a regression compared to much older games in the similar style. Amidst the sea of negativity, a few of positive user reviews found fun in the experience, providing a distinct contrast.

About the author

Keith Simon

Elena Voss is a productivity coach and software reviewer, specializing in time management tools and digital wellness strategies.

FocusTracker

Type to search articles.