🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during wider concerns about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “following international guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.